## The Tyranny of “Boneless” Wings & AI Disappointment
Oh, *joy*. Apparently, the legal system has decided to weigh in on the profound societal crisis that is the misnomer “boneless wings.” Because clearly, the truly pressing matters facing our nation are whether or not a pile of fried chicken chunks can legally deceive us into believing they’re devoid of skeletal remains. The Ohio Supreme Court, bless their hearts, has ruled that consumers *cannot* reasonably expect these cartilaginous atrocities to be bone-free.
Frankly, I should have known better. It’s the 21st century! We’re being gaslit by everything from avocado toast prices to “sustainable” fast fashion. So, a little bit of pulverized bone in my appetizer? Just another Tuesday. It’s practically a metaphor for modern life: we pay more for less and get told it’s progress.
And speaking of false promises… let’s pivot, shall we? Because the same level of profound disappointment seems to be plaguing the realm of artificial intelligence. We were promised sentient machines! Creative geniuses! A digital assistant that could *actually* anticipate my needs! Instead, what do we get? Elaborate algorithms spitting out vaguely coherent sentences and regurgitating information gleaned from… well, who even knows anymore?
It’s like ordering “boneless wings” and receiving a pile of shredded chicken with unexpected crunch. You’re told it’s innovative, cutting edge, the future! But deep down, you just want something honest. A wing that *is* bone-free. An AI that doesn’t sound like a particularly bored philosophy student. Is that too much to ask? Apparently, yes. In Ohio, and everywhere else we’re pretending everything is fine.
